Steven Johnston
University of South Florida
Three days before Thanksgiving, Barack Obama signed into
law the VOW to Hire Heroes Act, a piece
of political legislation of, at best, dubious economic value. It offers tax credits
to employers who hire veterans. Both parties lined up to support the bill knowing full well that it amounted to little more than political pandering. Despite
the fiscal crisis supposedly plaguing the American state, the legislation found
few if any detractors. The debt owed the brave men and women who make enormous
sacrifices to keep America safe, secure, and free rendered discussion
irrelevant. The United States military is perhaps the only institution that
transcends the fanatical obstructionism of the Republican Party, an entity so
hell-bent on free market utopianism (among others) that it continues to inflict
enormous damage on the country and its future. Good patriots that they are,
Republicans no doubt believe that harming the country they love is proof
positive they love it (with a partial exception for Ron Paul). True, former Republican
Senator and Defense Secretary William Cohen recently took the GOP to task for
endangering the country’s national security with its anti-tax hysteria, but
Cohen issued his rebuke not on behalf of the well-being of the United States
but of the American empire.
Does the United States military deserve the plaudits
routinely showered on it? This is an open question. For one thing, it is not a
citizen army composed of people serving their country in the spirit of equality
and mutual obligation. It is a self-selecting professional mercenary force. Too
many Americans clearly prefer to have someone else shoulder the responsibility
for common security. They have other and better things (the list is endless) to
do with their lives. This might seem (to
them) like a free ride without repercussions, an attitude no doubt fostered by
a culture of exceptionalism. Nevertheless, entrusting a free way of life to
guns-for-hire enables adventurist presidents like George W. Bush to endanger
the country at will without genuine fear of domestic blowback. The military
draws for support on regional cultures, perhaps especially in the south, that
thrive on war and the warrior ethos. They tend to support overwhelmingly the
very party and policies that place them in harm’s way and exact such staggering
tolls on them and their families. It’s a tangled web of narcissism, masochism,
and sadism, which I cannot explore here.
The imperial adventures they authorize, whether deposing
Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq or fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan, do
not involve American safety, security, or liberty, widespread legitimizing
rhetoric to the contrary notwithstanding. To keep American forces deployed
worldwide for longer and pointless engagements, the country keeps throwing an
increasing number of benefits in their direction, both material and symbolic.
Mercenaries must be compensated.
Meanwhile, Occupy Wall Street participants offer and risk
their lives in the name of democracy. They do so not only without prior promise
of remuneration from an obliging state but also with a reasonable expectation
of downright indifference from a highly depoliticized country. Such
indifference enables, even encourages police forces from coast to coast to
abuse and assault fellow citizens with a sense of impunity.
Mayors from New York to California invoke concerns for
public hygiene and equal access to public space to justify their militarized
responses to democracy in action. New York’s mayor, learning from a previous
public relations disaster, planned, in secret, a late night raid on Zuccotti
Park to clear Occupy Wall Street activists. Bloomberg’s late night pincer
movement resembled the totalitarian tactics of the secret police in the Soviet
Union depicted so brilliantly by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. It’s not that the
thuggish behavior of American mayors, high-ranking campus officials, and their
police auxiliaries doesn’t provoke outrage: witness the effective response to the UC-Davis Chancellor,
the suspension of the Davis Police Chief, and the Berkeley Academic Senate’s vote of no confidence scheduled for Monday, November 28 against that school’s
chancellor for police violence against students of Occupy Cal.
Still, the outrage tends to be unduly confined to the already
like-minded. It does not produce widespread disgust followed by real political
consequences. We are not (yet) Egypt. Bloomberg’s career should have ended with
this vicious middle-of-the-night assault on citizens. Of course, it should also
have ended following the 2004 GOP Convention in New York where similar police state tactics were implemented against citizens enacting democracy as George
Bush waged his personal war of choice in Iraq, but as the recent GOP debate in
Washington suggests, no politician will pay a price for sacrificing civil and
political liberties in the name of security. Why is it that most Americans
tolerate, even cheer, police violence against citizens? Is it that
identification with gratuitous displays of state power allows them to imagine
that they themselves also possess agency in a world that routinely and rudely
reminds them they are impotent?
Occupy Wall Street protestor & USMC Sgt. Shamar Thomas shares his views on police repression with NYPD officers (full video here). |
No comments:
Post a Comment